الدكتور محمد النشائى فى برنامج تلات ايام على قناة CBCeXtra بتاريخ 25-06-2014

Why E Is Not Equal to mc2

Download as PDF (Size:1027KB) PP. 743-750   

Author(s)   

M. S. El Naschie

ABSTRACT

We show that Einstein’s famous formula E = mc² is actually the sum of two quantum parts, namely E =mc²/22 of the quantum particle and E = mc² (21/22) of the quantum wave. We use first Magueijo-Smolin’s VSL theory to derive the relevant equation and then validate our results using ’tHooft-Veltman’s dimensional regularization. All in all our result confirms the COBE, WMAP, Planck and super nova cosmic measurements with astonishing precision.

KEYWORDS

Einstein’s Relativity, Dark Energy, Hawking’s Radiation, Transfinite Dimensional Regularization, Cantorian Space-Time Renormalization

Cite this paper

Naschie, M. (2014) Why E Is Not Equal to mc². Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 743-750. doi:10.4236/jmp.2014.59084.

References

[1]	Cox, B. and Forshaw, J. (2010) Why Does E = mc2? Da Capop Press-Perseus Books Group, Philadelphia.
[2]	Helal, M.A., Marek-Crnjac, L. and He, J.-H. (2013) Open Journal of Microphysics, 3, 141-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojm.2013.34020
[3]	Marek-Crnjac, L. (2013) International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3, 464-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2013.34053
[4]	El Naschie, M.S. (2013) Journal of Modern Physics, 4, 591-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.45084
[5]	El Naschie, M.S. (2013) Journal of Quantum Information Science, 3, 121-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2013.34016
[6]	Penrose, R. (2004) The Road to Reality. Jonathan Cape, London.
[7]	El Naschie, M.S., Rossler, O.E. and Prigogine, I. (1995) Quantum Mechanics, Diffusion and Chaotic Fractals. Pergamon Press/Elsevier, Oxford.
[8]	Chirardi, G. (2005) Sneaking a Look at God’s Cards. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[9]	Penrose, R. (1994) Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[10]	El Naschie, M.S. (2012) Revising Einstein’s E = mc2: A Theoretical Resolution of the Mystery of Dark Energy. The Fourth Arab International Conference in Physics and Materials Science, Alexandria, 1-3 October 2012.
[11]	He, J.-H. (2012) A Historical Scientific Announcement on Dark Energy. http://works.bepress.com/ji-huan_he/64.mini-symposium
[12]	He, J.-H. (2013) Fractal Space-Time & Non-Commutative Geometry in Quantum & High Energy Physics, 3, 1-2.
[13]	He, J.-H. and Marek-Crnjac, L. (2013) Fractal Space-Time & Non-Commutative Geometry in Quantum & High Energy Physics, 3, 130-137.
[14]	He, J.-H. and El Naschie, M.S. (2013) Fractal Space-Time and Non-Commutative Geometry in High Energy Physics, 3, 59-62.
[15]	El Naschie, M.S. (2013) International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3, 483-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2013.34056
[16]	El Naschie, M.S. (2013) American Journal of Modern Physics, 2, 357-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20130206.23
[17]	Longair, M. (2006) The Cosmic Century: “A History of Astrophyiscs and Cosmology”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[18]	Ruiz-Lapuente, P. (2010) Dark Energy: Observational and Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[19]	Bahcall, J., Piran, T. and Weinberg, S. (2004) Dark Matter in the Universe. World Scientific, Singapore.
[20]	Amendola, L. and Tsujikawa, S. (2010) Dark Energy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750823
[21]	Mortonson, M.J., Weinberg, D.H. and White, M. (2013) Dark Energy. arXiv:1401.0046V1[astro-ph co]
[22]	Dingle, H. (1972) Science at the Crossroads. Martin Brian and O’Keefe, London.
[23]	Ohanian, H.C. (2009) Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 40, 167-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.03.002
[24]	Mc-Crea, W.H. (1967) Nature, 216, 122-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/216122a0
[25]	Overbye, D. (2002) Roll over Einstein. New York Times, 31 December 2002, 2.
[26]	Dingle, H. (1973) Nature, 244, 567-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/244567a0
[27]	El Naschie, M.S. (1990) Stress, Stability and Chaos in Structural Engineering: An Energy Approach. McGraw Hill, London, Tokyo.
[28]	Heisenberg, W. (1969) Der Teil und das Ganze. R. Piper Verlag, München. (English Edition (1971) Physics and Beyond. Harper and Row, New York.)
[29]	El Naschie, M.S. (1994) Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 4, 1141-1145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-0779(94)90027-2
[30]	El Naschie, M.S. (2005) Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 24, 941-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2004.10.001
[31]	Dyson, F. (1988) Infinite in all Directions. Harper & Row, New York.
[32]	El Naschie, M.S. (2013) International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, 2, 43-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijmnta.2013.21005
[33]	Magueijo, J. (2003) Faster than the Speed of Light. Arrow Books, the Random House, London.
[34]	Mageuijo, J. and Smolin, L. (2001) Lorentz Invariance with an Invariant Energy Scale. arXiv:hep-th/0112090V2
[35]	El Naschie, M.S. (2013) Journal of Quantum Information Science, 3, 57-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2013.32011
[36]	Marek-Crnjac, L., El Naschie, M.S. and He, J.H. (2013) International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, 2, 78-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijmnta.2013.21A010
[37]	Wapner, L.M. (2005) The Pea and the Sun. A.K. Peters Ltd., Wellesley.
[38]	’tHooft, G. (2001) A Confrontation with Infinity. In: Sidharth, B. and Altaisky, M., Eds., Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 4, Kluwer-Plenum, New York, 1-12.
[39]	El Naschie, M.S. (2001) ‘tHooft Dimensional Regularization Implies Transfinite Heterotic String Theory and Dimensional Transmutation. In: Sidharth, B. and Altaisky, M., Eds., Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 4, Kluwer-Plenum, New York, 81-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1339-1_7
[40]	Kaku, M. (1999) Introduction to Superstrings and M-Theory. Springer, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0543-2
[41]	Mason, P. (2010) Quantum Glory. XP Publishing, Arizona.

This was addressed to the Media Lawyer of the Press Gazette (http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/49607)

We are confident that this site is a respectable blog which expresses legally and morally founded opinion and not some biased opinion prompted by various favours and monetary income via advertisements as so many blogs are nowadays.  I spoke with Prof. M.S. El Naschie and I do not think he will object on expressing a balance and fair account of what really happened far away from the bravado and mutual admiration which journalists and media have for each other when the other side is the public with no media interest or financial backing of press moguls and media conglomerates.  Let us start with the view and questions contained in this article.

1.       You say what a pity that such a case takes three years to settle.  What a pity indeed but pity for whom?  You may ask your good self how could such a case take three years when Nature employed an army of solicitors, a QC with a high reputation and questionable techniques while Prof. El Naschie was not represented.  Would this not say on its own for any objective person that Nature had such an extremely weak defence but an enormous amount of money to spend in order to show that might is right.  Would this not be a fair comment for a fair person?

2.       You said people would like to forbid a corporate to take an ordinary person to Court for libel.  However the case of El Naschie is exactly the opposite.  It is an ordinary university professor, and I say ordinary although he is Egyptian, who sued a giant media mogul Nature/Macmillan who with a wink of their finger can get any amount of expert witnesses on their side for the benefit of later on being able to publish in Nature with the good will of its Editorial Board all apart from being able to spend five million or so pounds without a blink of the eyes because easy come, easy go.  It is Macmillan after all who pays and what are they defending?  They are defending basically a German journalist, not a scientist, who was hired by a clique of scientists who were determined to defame Prof. El Naschie for reasons discussed at length in the Court.  In fact it was one of the main demands of Prof. El Naschie to transfer this case to a criminal court.

3.       The awesome expenses were not a problem for Nature.  It was a colossal problem for the university professor who sued them.  At the end because of the pressure exerted by Nature’s worldwide web, Prof. El Naschie’s lawyer asked to be relieved from their agreement of no win, no fee which unlike the USA is not that common in the UK.  So at the end El Naschie stood alone in Court.

4.       The Court did not see 80% of the proofs that Quirin Schiermeier knowingly defamed El Naschie due to court procedural steps which a layman did not know or take.  For instance his request for the Editor in Chief of Nature be called as a witness was rejected and the log books of the refereed papers which Boehm brought to the Court were rejected and the Judge did not meet Boehm who travelled extra from Germany to see the Judge.

5.       This is only a sample of what happened in this extraordinary mistrial and mistrial it is.  I am assured, failing some new development, that this trial is not the end.  There will be higher instance on the UK level as well if needed, on the European and international level.

6.       You should see Prof. El Naschie’s record of publication since the end of the trial and resigning as an Editor in Chief of the journal which he founded and partially financed, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.  While Prof. El Naschie’s citation since 2011 have at least doubled and the number of his published papers has tripled, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals under the new orchestra of Elsevier, plunged into near nothingness reflecting the general trend of Elsevier’s reputation.  Please check these facts for yourself and read the mickey mouse letter for an out of Court settlement which Nature’s Editor in Chief was forced to write to Prof. El Naschie and which Prof. El Naschie rejected because it required him to lie.  Please check the chequered background of Die Zeit’s journalist friend of Quirin Schiermeier in Hamburg and please check the despicable blog called ElNaschieWatch which was erected specifically to defame Prof. Mohamed El Naschie around the clock with instructions from Hamburg.  Please check the connection of the whole thing with Dr. Mohamed Albaradei and Dr. Ahmed Zewail, two minor figures in the so called Arab spring.  All this is in Court documents if you have the time to read them and you will know the extent of this disgraceful conspiracy which went as far as perverting the course of justice by false witness, paid for and coming extra from Canada. 

7.       If you are a solicitor interested in justice you should find it sad that individuals have no chance of getting justice when it comes to fighting a media mogul.

By the way how do you know that Nature is the most respected scientific journal?  Nature has an impact factor that is true.  Therefore many people read it, some of them not scientists at all.  Politicians read it and that is how it influences their funding policy.  Consequently Nature has the funding policy of science of at least England in hand.  Nature magazine is two parts, scientific papers and the rest is gossip conducted by people like Quirin Schiermeier, the doubtful German journalist as far as El Naschie is concerned.  It was Quirin Schiermeier who wrote the article without the approval or the knowledge of the Editor in Chief.  Dr. Campbell was not in the country and it was his Deputy who approved publication.  It is a well known secret that Dr. Campbell fired his Deputy when he came back and knew for the first time about the story through Prof. El Naschie’s letter of complaint.  So far Dr. Campbell’s behaviour was correct.  Dr. Campbell erred when he thought that protecting falsely the reputation of one of Nature’s employees is more important than the truth and stuck to his guns and the millions of dollars at his disposal from the infinite funds of Nature/Macmillan. And even if we grant that Nature has an impeccable reputation, why should this be a reason that a minor journalist of thousands working for Nature and Macmillan should be susceptible to bribery for all sorts and behave illegally and improperly.  Suppose the janitor of the sanitary equipment in the Vatican commits an illegal act in or outside the Vatican, why then should the present Pope who probably has the best reputation of all Popes for a long time be responsible or why should the janitor be by definition not guilty because he basically works for this exceptional Pope.  There is really a comical side to this constant praise of Nature as if it is a single human being.  Nature’s quality varies with the quality of the Editor in Chief and their current staff as well as the people who write in it.  Quirin Schiermeier is one of the worst examples in the history of Nature and this defamation case against El Naschie which has not ended until this moment will be one of the worst cases in the history of Nature and in fact in history from the time after the second world war and you can quote us on that.  I hope you find the reasons given here and as I said they are nothing but a fraction of the various reasons which are not given due to space limitation and fear of prejudicing the case of Prof. El Naschie.  Thank you for publishing these words of truth uncensored.

تعليق الدكتور النشائى على خطاب سيادة الرئيس عبد الفتاح السيسى (جريدة المسائية بتاريخ 10-06-2014 صفحة 5)

تعليق الدكتور النشائى على خطاب سيادة الرئيس عبد الفتاح السيسى (جريدة المسائية بتاريخ 10-06-2014 صفحة 5)

EL NASCHIE WINS LIBEL CASE, NATURE IS DISGRACED AND LOOSE MORALLY 3 YEAR LONG LEGAL ORDEAL WHICH CULMINATED IN A THREE WEEK TRIAL

Despite the above heading this case far from being over.  Of course Nature spent the better part of 5 million British pounds to buy themselves a whitewash via a complex, intricate and very expensive British libel law.  They hired a Queen’s Counsel, called in England a Silk in addition to an army of solicitors via the largest law firm in the country.  They went as far as causing the resignation of a Lord Justice because he wanted them to apologise to Prof. El Naschie and call it a day by finding an out of Court settlement.  They claimed this natural request by an experienced Judge prejudiced the case.  They worked very hard to replace him by a relatively inexperienced High Court Judge who just happens to have graduated from the same Chambers from which the QC representing Nature comes with all sorts of strings attached.  Never the less because Prof. Mohamed Salah El-Din El Naschie was not legally represented the case will go on in the Court of Appeal without any time limitation and after that there is still possibly the House of Lords but definitely the European Courts of Justice in Strasburg.  El Naschie maintained from the outset that this is a case for the Old Bailey, i.e. criminal court and turning it into putting science on trial is a perversion of the legal system of Britain and is comparable only to the Vatican putting Galileo’s theory on trial.  The background of this case is well known from the documents which are available for the public to read, being Court documents of a British court case.  Even the most gullible person will know that the campaign against El Naschie was orchestrated by those who hired a German journalist based in Munich and another German gutter press journalist based in Hamburg.  In addition those behind the conspiracy hired a psychopath confined to a wheelchair working in Seattle USA as an expert of character assassination.  He established a disgusting website called ElNaschieWatch to assist Nature in this trial by spreading lies and defamation around the clock against Prof. El Naschie.  In addition they hired people working for Wikipedia as well as Google apart of their association with disgraced Egyptians such as Ahmed Zewail a Nobel Laureate in Experimental Chemistry who badly wanted to replace Hosni Mubarak as President for Egypt after the so called Arab Spring Revolutions which swept the Middle East via an artificial wind coming from the West.  There is far more to this story than meets the eye and it is more disgusting than frightening and shows to which degree otherwise respectable institutions and people are ready to degrade themselves to steal other peoples’ work.  The solicitor of Nature found it acceptable to enlist the help of a fractal spacetime imposter to lie under oath in open court as an expert witness who really knows nothing about the subject he was talking about.  The idea of fractal spacetime started in earnest with the work of British Canadian physicist Garnet Ord and subsequently French astrophysicist Laurent Nottale and finally Egyptian engineering scientist and theoretical physicist Mohamed El Naschie who in addition to giving up differentiablity, halso gave up continuity in the spirit of the highly mathematical theory of the continuum hypothesis and ultimate L of Woodin.  The problem which the people behind all this are now facing is that Mohamed El Naschie is not dead.  He is alive and kicking and as active as ever.  The assertion of Peter Woit that Nature ended El Naschie’s career is multi-fold wrong.  El Naschie never considered theoretical physics and his theory a career or professional work.  It was, it is and will always be his hobby, love and passion, nothing more.  Incidentally in his witness statement, the fake fractal spacetime witness described Peter Woit as a non-scientist who was never a professor of physics anywhere and who works merely as a trouble shooter for the computer facility of an American university.  Why Peter Woit is suddenly full of praise for this imposter is something worth thinking about, or maybe not.  The fact is Mohamed El Naschie was not deterred by this savage attack.  In fact it produced the opposite effect on him and his surroundings.  He is now publishing more papers than ever having been relieved from the burden of running Chaos, Solitons & Fractals which consumed a lot of time and was at the end a thankless job which brought him nothing.  In fact he was supporting the journal out of his own pocket while Elsevier, the truly Dutch publisher were filling their pockets with hundreds of thousands of dollars which are now drying up since Mohamed El Naschie left the journal which he founded and ran as one of his hobbies.  Of course Nature’s friends and the people behind the disgraceful defamation campaign are trying to put an embargo on El Naschie’s publications.  More frequently than not, these things produce the opposite effect.  Rather than despair El Naschie surprised everyone with his recent work in effect showing that there is a critical parameter or scaling component at which spacetime undergoes a fractal space transition.  This parameter is closely related, in fact identical, to the dark energy density measured by WMAP and supernova analysis which earned the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics.  It is also identical in concept to the ‘t Hooft/Veltman/Wilson dimensional regularization procedure.  An up to date summary of this work may be found in the following paper ‘The meta energy of dark energy’, Open Journal of Philosophy, 2014, 4, p. 157-159 and ‘Cosmic dark energy from ‘t Hooft’s dimensional regularization and Witten’s topological quantum field pure gravity’, Journal of Quantum Information Science, 2014, 4, p. 83-91 (both http://www.scirp.org)   and Deriving E = mc² of Einstein’s ordinary quantum relativity energy density from the Lie symmetry group…, American Journal of Mechanics, 2014, 2(2), p. 6-9 (http://sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajma). 

سطوة زويل ولوبي المتأمركين الوفد بتاريخ 04-05-2014

سطوة زويل ولوبي المتأمركين

السادة رئيس الوزراء، ورئيس الجمهورية.. ومستشاري الرئاسة من حاملي الجنسية الأمريكية وأتباعهم لماذا تجاملون أحمد زويل على حساب المصلحة العامة وإهدار أحكام القضاء؟!

العالم أحمد زويل لم يقدم للجامعات ولا مراكز البحوث العلمية في بلدنا أي مساعدات من منح دراسية أو تحديث معامل أو معونات علمية أسوة بما قدمه غيره من الأساتذة العلماء المصريين الموجودين بالخارج!
العالم أحمد زويل لم يحاول أن يلعب دوراً في أزمة مصر مع الحكومة الأمريكية بعد خلع الإخوان، وتدهور العلاقات رغم أنه ضمن فريق مستشارى الرئيس أوباما، وكان يستطيع أن يمارس ضغوطاً لدعم قيادة ثورة 30 يونية. لكنه اختفى وتجاهل ولم يفعل!
معنى هذا أن الرجل منحاز للموقف الأمريكي الداعم للإخوان.. وإلا لماذا التزم الصمت المريب طوال مراحل الأزمة وحتى الآن؟!
الدولة احتفلت به وكرَّمته ومنحته عرضاً سخياً لانشاء جامعة علمية تحمل اسمه وتقام على أرض قدمتها له بلا مقابل.. ولم يبنها فقام رئيس الوزراء نظيف ورفاقه من الشخصيات العلمية بتمويل عملية إنشاء جامعة النيل على تلك الأرض من أموال وزارة الاتصالات والمساهمين من الشخصيات العلمية منذ عام 2001.
لكن اللوبي الأمريكي من حاملي الجنسية الأمريكية وخريجي جامعاتها وأعوانهم من المتأمركين والموالين لعبوا دوراً مشبوهاً في سلب جامعة النيل ومنحها هدية لزويل الذي جمع ما يقرب من مليار جنيه تبرعات لا يعلم أحد أين ذهبت!
هذا اللوبي الذي يضم أحمد المسلماني وقت كان مستشاره الإعلامي واستفاد وأفاد.. وشاركه رئيس الوزراء عصام شرف ومن بعده الببلاوي وحجازي وفشير وحجي وغيرهم.. استطاعوا خلال وزارة الببلاوي تعطيل حكم المحكمة الإدارية العليا الذي قضى بإلزام الحكومة بتسليم أراضي ومباني جامعة النيل الى أصحابها.. وإلغاء قرارات مجلس الوزراء الصادرة لصالح جامعة زويل!
اللوبي الأمريكي واتباعهم في الرئاسة استطاعوا في وزارة محلب أيضاً أن يلتفوا مرة اخرى على القانون الصادر عن المحكمة الادارية العليا ضد الطعون التي قدمها دفاع زويل بالرفض وأحقية جامعة النيل في أراضيها ومبانيها..!!
ضغوط اللوبي الأمريكي أجبرت جامعة النيل على قبول تواجد جامعة زويل في أحد مبانيها.. والأهم استصدروا قراراً جمهورياً بمنح زويل وجامعته الوهمية قطعة أرض بمساحة حوالي 197 فداناً بمدينة السادس من أكتوبر من الأراضي الخاضعة لولاية هيئة المجتمعات العمرانية.. وذلك بنظام حق الانتفاع دون مقابل بدلاً من أراضي ومباني الشيخ زايد التي حكمت المحكمة الإدارية العليا بردها لجامعة النيل!
الأرض التي خصصها رئيس الجمهورية المؤقت للمحظوظ والمسنود زويل تقع بجوار القرية الكونية بمنطقة حدائق أكتوبر، وهى أرض كاملة المرافق.. ومن أميز وأغلى الأراضي قيمة وسعراً، ويمكن أن تعطي ملايين دعماً لخزانة الدولة لو تم بيعها بالمزاد!!
لكن ماذا نفعل مع حكومات مرتعشة.. أمام نفوذ وضغوط اللوبي الموالي لأمريكا؟!

الوفد - سطوة زويل ولوبي المتأمركين 

مجلس علماء مصر يهنئ السيسى لفوزه برئاسة الجمهورية

مجلس علماء مصر يهنئ السيسى لفوزه برئاسة الجمهورية

الخميس، 29 مايو 2014 - 11:53

المشير السيسى الفائز برئاسة الجمهورية

كتبت هند عادل

هنأ مجلس علماء مصر المشير السيسى بفوزه فى الانتخابات الرئاسية، فى ظل خطورة المرحلة وأهمية العمل المشترك لتغيير الوضع الأليم الذى تمر به البلاد ويعانى منه الشعب.

وأوضح المجلس فى بيانه أن هذا التغيير المنشود الذى دفعنا لاختيار شخص يقدر قيمة الوطن ويدرك مشكلات الشعب ولديه رؤية سياسية واقتصادية واجتماعية تعلى مكانة العلم وتقدر إنتاج العلماء بما يخدم هذه الرؤية ويحولها لحقيقة واقعة على أرض هذا الوطن لتسهم فى حل مشكلاته وتكون حافزا لتحويل مصر من مؤخرة الترتيب الدولى فى كثير من التصنيفات للمقدمة وللمكانة التى تستحقها، وهذا لن يتأتى إلا بعمل مهم وضرورى وعاجل يطلب منكم كرئيس للجمهورية وهو إبعاد كل من لا يستطيع أو لا يقدر على خدمة الوطن على مختلف الأسباب والاستعانة لكل من يقدر ويعمل على خدمة هذا الوطن.

وأكد المجلس فى بيانه على دعمهم الكامل للمشير وضرورة الاصطفاف الوطنى ليكون المجلس فى هذا الاصطفاف، وتقديم مجموعة كبيرة من خبرات العلماء وأبحاثهم ومشاريعهم القابلة للتطبيق، والتى ستكون عاملا هاما فى تحقيق تقدم المجتمع خلال المرحلة المقبلة.